Home History Religion leaders ask why Jan. 6 report overlooked Christian nationalism

Religion leaders ask why Jan. 6 report overlooked Christian nationalism

Religion leaders ask why Jan. 6 report overlooked Christian nationalism

Requested by lawmakers this 12 months to explain those that attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police informed the Home choose committee tasked with investigating the rebellion that “it was clear the terrorists perceived themselves to be Christians.”

Two members of the committee, Reps. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.) and Adam Kinzinger of (R-Ailing.), additionally independently famous in conversations with the information media the incidence of Christian nationalism.

“Had there not been a few of these errant prophecies, this concept that God has ordained it to be Trump, I’m unsure January 6 would have occurred prefer it did,” Kinzinger, an evangelical Christian, stated on a Christianity As we speak podcast episode in March.

Certainly, the affect of Christian nationalism among the many Jan. 6 rioters was clearly evident within the flags and banners they waved. Within the days earlier than the assault, “Jericho Marchers,” impressed by the Bible’s E-book of Joshua, circled Capitol Hill praying for the election outcomes to be overturned. When rioters stormed into the Senate chamber Jan. 6, they huddled in prayer.

But the committee’s remaining report, a 845-page doc launched Dec. 22, talked about Christian nationalism by title precisely as soon as, and solely in passing.

Learn the Jan. 6 committee remaining report

Some outstanding Christian leaders had pressed the committee to look at Christian nationalism, sending a letter to the members in June urging lawmakers to research the ideology’s influence on the occasions of Jan. 6.

On Thursday, the Rev. Nathan Empsall, the pinnacle of the group Devoted America and a signer of the letter, launched a statement in response to the report, saying, “The January 6 committee giving solely passing point out to the pivotal position of Christian nationalism in its remaining report is a missed alternative to completely perceive what led to violence on the Capitol — and to forestall future political violence.”

The report’s one overt reference to Christian nationalism got here when describing supporters of Nick Fuentes, a right-wing Catholic who was in Washington on Jan. 6 however has not been accused of getting into the Capitol constructing. The report notes that Fuentes’s followers, usually self-described as “Groypers,” have “repeatedly promoted white supremacist and Christian nationalist beliefs,” but it surely didn’t elaborate as to how.

Devotees of Fuentes’s group, America First, are recognized for chanting “Christ is king,” as they did in Washington the morning of the rebellion. Fuentes himself, a white supremacist and antisemite, is considered one of a number of extremists who started overtly associating themselves with Christian nationalism by title after the rebellion.

The report additionally makes a number of mentions of “Jericho March” occasions that led as much as the Capitol assault, though the committee didn’t delve into the spiritual tenor of these gatherings, regardless of the demonstrators’ hymn-singing, and the presence of banners with spiritual slogans and even the blowing of shofars by these in attendance.

The report does repeatedly cite a Washington Submit op-ed by Peter Manseau, through which the historian and founding director of the Smithsonian Nationwide Museum of American Historical past’s Heart for the Understanding of Faith in American Historical past, catalogued how spiritual beliefs influenced one rioter’s participation on Jan. 6.

Manseau responded to the report in a Twitter thread, lamenting the “scant consideration” paid within the report back to “the spiritual dimensions of the assault,” arguing that the omission “could show a disservice to historical past.”

Manseau speculated that the shortage of consideration to Christian nationalism could also be a “strategic” transfer, saying on Twitter that committee members in all probability didn’t need to “danger ‘J6 Committee Targets Christianity’ turning into a speaking level.”

Kinzinger has been an outspoken critic of Christian nationalism, tweeting his condemnation of the ideology on a number of events and rebuffing calls by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) that the Republican Celebration change into the “occasion of Christian nationalism.”

Raskin stated in Might 2021 that he had taken a private curiosity within the “marriage between Donald Trump and fundamentalist Christianity.” He stated the tie was a supply of “bafflement” to him however that he had begun studying books corresponding to Kristin Kobes Du Mez’s “Jesus and John Wayne” — a piece cited by many students who examine Christian nationalism.

On Dec. 14, Raskin heard testimony on the topic on Capitol Hill from Amanda Tyler, the manager director of Baptist Joint Committee for Non secular Liberty and the founding father of Christians In opposition to Christian Nationalism.

“Christian nationalism helped gas the assault on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, uniting disparate actors and infusing their political trigger with spiritual fervor,” Tyler informed the Home Oversight subcommittee on civil rights and civil liberties, which Raskin chairs.

Christians In opposition to Christian Nationalism co-produced a report on its view of Christian nationalism’s position within the Jan. 6 riot however declined to touch upon the report’s launch.

The exact purpose for Christian nationalism’s normal absence from the report stays a thriller. A latest Washington Submit investigation into the doc’s drafting quoted Jeremy Adler, a spokesman for Rep. Liz Cheney (R), who sits on the committee, as saying the Wyoming lawmaker “received’t signal onto any ‘narrative’” relating to Jan. 6 that “suggests each American who believes God has blessed America is a white supremacist.”

Faith Information Service


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here