In September the Pew Analysis Heart modeled 4 potential futures for American faith, relying on totally different charges of conversion to and disaffiliation from the nation’s faiths. In three of the 4 projections, the Christian share of the U.S. inhabitants, which hovered round 90 p.c within the Nineteen Seventies and Eighties, drops beneath 50 p.c inside the subsequent half-century. In two situations, the Christian share drops beneath 50 p.c a lot sooner, someday round 2040, after which retains on falling.

It is a doubtlessly epochal transition, however a transition of what sort? Towards a really secular America, with John Lennon’s “Think about” as its nationwide anthem? Or towards a society awash in new or remixed types of spirituality, all competing for the souls of lapsed Catholics, erstwhile United Methodists, the unhappily-unchurched?

Ten years in the past I revealed a e-book known as “Unhealthy Faith: How We Turned a Nation of Heretics,” which supplied an interpretation of the nation’s shifting non secular panorama, the sharp post-Sixties decline of institutional religion. Earlier than the e-book’s anniversary slips away, I believed I’d revisit the argument, to see the way it holds up as a information to our now-more-de-Christianized society.

What the e-book proposed was that “secularization” wasn’t a helpful label for the American non secular transformation. As a substitute, I wrote, American tradition appears “as God-besotted in the present day as ever” — nonetheless fascinated with the determine of Jesus of Nazareth, nonetheless looking for divine favor and transcendence. However these pursuits and obsessions are a lot much less prone to be channeled by church buildings, Protestant and Catholic, that keep some connection to historic Christian orthodoxies. As a substitute, our longtime nationwide impulse towards heresy — towards customized revisions of Christian doctrine, Americanized updates of the gospel — has lastly accomplished its victory over older Christian establishments and traditions.

The result’s a spiritual panorama dominated by well-liked Christian concepts which have “gone mad,” as G.Ok. Chesterton as soon as put it, “as a result of they’ve been remoted from one another and are wandering alone.” This America has a church of self-love, with prophets like Oprah Winfrey preaching a gospel of the divine self, a “God Inside” spirituality that dangers making selfishness a advantage. It has a church of prosperity, with figures like Joel Osteen as its bishops, that insists that God wishes nothing extra for his elect than American prosperity, capitalist success. And it has church buildings of politics, preaching redemption by political activism — a Christian nationalism on the appropriate, by turns messianic and apocalyptic, and a progressive utopianism on the left, satisfied that historical past’s arc bends all the time in its favor.

These heresies, I argued, are extra vital to understanding the true affect of faith in America than something that comes out of the Roman Catholic Church or the Southern Baptist Conference. You possibly can perceive our religious state of affairs extra utterly by studying “The Da Vinci Code,” “Eat, Pray, Love” and “Your Greatest Life Now” than by shopping a papal encyclical (or for that matter an atheist polemic). And you’ll see extra of Christianity’s enduring however now deformed affect in will.i.am’s movie star hymns to Barack Obama in 2008, or Glenn Beck’s right-wing revivals a few years later, than in no matter cultural authority nonetheless attaches to the New Testomony or the Nicene Creed.

So ran my case in 2012. Ten years gone, has the framework held up?

In sure methods, clearly so. Take into account the peculiar phenomenon of Donald Trump, an obvious heathen who someway managed to grab the management of the nation’s extra non secular political celebration, after which to be handled by a few of its extra zealous members as a form of anointed king.

Trump’s ascent was a testomony to the power of key heresies — prosperity theology, self-help faith and a jingoistic Christian nationalism — inside the non secular proper. Notably, Trump’s predominant institutional connection to Christianity was his long-ago attendance at Norman Vincent Peale’s church in Manhattan, on the time when Peale was well-known because the guru of religious self-actualization, the creator of “The Energy of Constructive Pondering.”

As a celeb businessman and huckster Trump turned out to be a pure champion for Peale’s extra right-wing heirs, gathering in allies from the realm of movie star pastors and prosperity preachers. In the meantime, as a tribune of American greatness, he ended up interesting to the extra nationalist components of evangelicalism — together with voters who had been extra prone to determine with Christianity as a cultural marker of “American-ness” than to truly attend church.

When Paula White-Cain, a TV preacher and self-help creator, emerged as a key religious adviser to Trump in 2016, the Southern Baptist chief Russell Moore tweeted that White is “a charlatan and acknowledged as a heretic by each orthodox Christian, of no matter tribe.” If Moore was talking for orthodoxy in opposition to heresy, the Trump period urged that heresy was the stronger celebration: White gave the inauguration invocation, Moore turned a lightning rod amongst Southern Baptists for his anti-Trump stance, and the concept Christian conservatism ought to have clear ethical or doctrinal requirements for its leaders handed away.

Whereas Trumpism was being enabled by heresies of the appropriate, liberalism within the Trump period ended up infused by heresy to a level that even I didn’t see coming. The thought of wokeness didn’t determine in “Unhealthy Faith,” which got here out earlier than the brand new wave of campus activism, earlier than Black Lives Matter and #MeToo and the diversity-equity-inclusion period. However the “Nice Awokening” is an ideal instance of Christian religious energies reduce unfastened from orthodox perception — a model of Protestant revivalism stripped of Protestant dogmatics, however retaining a crusading zeal, a rhetoric of conversion and confession and ethical transformation, a sometimes-frenzied urge to solid out the evil and unclean.

Social justice progressivism has many influences, after all. However it needs to be understood, partly, as a religious descendant of Puritanism, occupying the locus of Puritan energy (the outdated Protestant citadels of the Ivy League and the Northeastern institution), adapting the outdated spirit of ethical perfectionism to a brand new set of points and calls for.

So on proper and left alike, the nation-of-heretics framework nonetheless appears helpful. However then the query, and the problem for my thesis now, is precisely how far the decline of Christianity can go earlier than a time period like “heresy” stops being analytically acceptable. As a result of sooner or later, presumably, the affect of Christianity turns into merely genealogical, and it’s a must to credit score religious experimenters with reaching distinct non secular territory.

A core of Christian follow and perception on this nation appears comparatively resilient. However the concept of a “nation of heretics” assumed numerous People with unfastened ties to Christianity — Christmas-and-Easter churchgoers, individuals raised with at the very least some concept of the religion’s tenets. And it’s the loosely-affiliated who’ve separated most lately, additional attenuating the connections between Christianity and its attainable rivals or successors.

Whereas wokeness is a variation on the Protestant social gospel, it’s clearly the most-de-Christianized kind but; it’s glad to search out allies inside the Christian church buildings, but it surely’s personal religious tasks usually tend to contain the elevation of indigenous, pre-Christian spiritualities.

A placing improvement of the Trump period is the emergence of a self-consciously post-Christian proper — a Nietzschean or neopagan tendency, extra very on-line than actually politically vital, however nonetheless a non-Christian novelty, and never a welcome one.

Lastly in youth non secular tradition, mediated by social-media developments that had been of their infancy 10 years in the past, many extra People are experimenting with explicitly post-Christian concepts and influences: Astrology, witchcraft, spiritualism, the hallucinogenic quest.

Once I was writing “Unhealthy Faith” there was nonetheless curiosity within the numerous “historic Jesus” tasks, the scholarly reconstructions that promised to ship a Jesus higher suited the religious assumptions of a late-modern United States. And it felt like there was a powerful cultural incentive to recruit some model of the Nazarene — as Dan Brown did in The Da Vinci Code, as an example — to your private religious venture, to realize Jesus’s blessing for leaving Christian orthodoxy behind.

At this time, although, my sense is that Jesus himself is much less culturally central, much less mandatory to spiritual entrepreneurs — as if the place People are going now of their post-Christian explorations, they don’t need or want his blessing.

That shift in priorities doesn’t inform us precisely the place they’re going. However it’s sufficient for now to say that the “post-Christian” label matches the general development in American spirituality greater than it did a decade in the past.

That form of shift, although, reveals the unpredictability of the non secular future as a lot as its inevitability. The Pew report, notably, treats a hypothetical “establishment” situation — no one altering their faith — as its greatest case for Christianity’s future in America. It doesn’t have a situation the place Christian development returns, the place a bigger share of America is Christian in 2050 than in the present day.

I wouldn’t count on a social scientist to anticipate that form of reversal. However Introduction and Christmas aren’t about developments extending as earlier than; they’re about rupture, renewal, rebirth. That’s what American Christianity wants now — now as ever, now as in these first days when its complete future was contained within the thriller and vulnerability of a mom and a baby.

Merry Christmas.

The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed below are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Observe The New York Occasions Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTOpinion) and Instagram.